Appeal No. 95-4866
Application 08/179,770
SOMECAL 2,306,058 Oct. 29,2
1976
(French patent application)
THE REJECTIONS
The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
follows: claims 46 and 48 over Willingham, Hummelshoj and
either Rossetti or SOMECAL, in view of Botting; claims 32, 36-
39, 44, 45 and 47 over these references, further in view of
Rost; claims 33-35 and 41-43 over the references applied to
claims 32, 36-39, 44, 45 and 47, further in view of Sontag,
Welden and Lowndes; claim 40 over the references applied to
claims 32, 36-39, 44, 45 and 47, further in view of any one of
Bogenschutz, Johnstone and Therneau.
OPINION
We have carefully considered all of the arguments
advanced by appellant and the examiner and agree with
appellant that the aforementioned rejections are not well
founded. Accordingly, these rejections will be reversed.
Willingham discloses a portable concrete molding
2 Our consideration of this reference is based on an
English translation thereof, a copy of which is provided to
appellant with this decision.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007