Appeal No. 95-4918
Application No. 08/114,293
and
the respective viewpoints of appellants and the examiner. As
a
consequence of our review, we make the determination which
follows.
We reverse the rejection of appellants’ claims under
35 U.S.C. § 103.
Claim 13 is drawn to a device for damping the motion
sequences of two masses, comprising, inter alia, a signal
processing circuit including means for filtering at least
sensor output signals representing relative motion between the
two masses, dependent on frequencies of at least respective
ones of sensor output signals representing relative motion.
Akin to appellants’ invention, each of the relevant
patents
relied upon by the examiner addresses a circuit including
not only the specific teachings, but also the inferences which
one skilled in the art would reasonably have been expected to
draw from the disclosure. See In re Preda, 401 F.2d 825, 826,
159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968).
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007