THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JAMES W. FEENEY,
JOHN D. JABUSCH,
ROBERT F. LUSCH
and HOWARD T. OLNOWICH
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4937
Application 08/017,0881
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, KRASS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 7. Claims
8 and 15, although finally rejected, have now been indicated by the examiner in the answer
as being allowable. Thus, claims 1 through 7 are the only claims before us.
1Application for patent filed February 12, 1993
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007