Appeal No. 95-4985
Application No. 08/164,227
distributed over the periphery of and in
the walls of said constriction, and
c) the resultant mixture passes through a pipe in
which the components react to form a product
stream.
PRIOR ART
The references of record relied upon by the examiner are:
Zaby et al. (Zaby) 5,117,048 May 26, 1992
(filed Dec. 14, 1988)
Orthmann et al. (Orthmann) 5,360,885 Nov. 1, 1994
(filed Dec. 07, 1993)
Sweeney, F. M, Introduction to Reaction Injection Molding,
Technomic Pub., pp. 90-101 (1979) (hereinafter referred to as
“Sweeney”).
REJECTION
The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:
(1) Claims 1 through 12 under the judicially created
doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as unpatentable
over the claims of U.S. Patent 5,360,885 (Orthmann);
and
(2) Claims 1 through 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Zaby and
Sweeney.
DISCUSSION
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007