Ex parte JENKINSON - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-5020                                                           
          Application 08/151,041                                                       


          consider-ation.                                                              
               The invention relates to a method of and apparatus for                  
          monitoring partial discharge activity in an insulating medium.               
               Independent claim 36 is reproduced as follows:                          
               36. Apparatus for monitoring a partial discharge in an                  
               insulating medium comprising:                                           
                    waveform generator means for generating a time                     
                    varying exciting waveform to an insulating                         
                    medium and for generating a trigger pulse for                      
                    initiating a partial discharge in said                             
                    insulating medium; and                                             
                    coupling means for applying the exciting                           
                    waveform and the trigger pulse to a sample of                      
                    said insula-ting medium so that partial                            
                    discharge activity is initiated in the medium                      
                    substantially simultan- eously with the                            
                    occurrence of the trigger pulse.                                   
               The reference relied on by the Examiner is as follows:                  
               McFerrin            3,727,128                 Apr. 10, 1973             
               Claims 53 and 54 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                  
          second paragraph.  Claims 36, 37, 42, 46, 47, 52 and 55 stand                
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by                       
          McFerrin.  Claim 56 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                 
          being unpatentable over McFerrin.                                            
               Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the                    


                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007