Ex parte KROSNER et al. - Page 1




                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                
              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                         
              publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                
                                                                                     Paper No. 16                        

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                     __________                                                          
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                     __________                                                          
                                          Ex parte STEPHEN P. KROSNER                                                    
                                           and FLOYD W. SHACKELFORD                                                      
                                                     __________                                                          
                                                 Appeal No. 95-5021                                                      
                                               Application 07/929,0821                                                   
                                                     ___________                                                         
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                     ___________                                                         

              Before MARTIN, FLEMING and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
              CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-8, which constitute all the                  
              claims remaining in the application.                                                                       
                     Claim 1 reads as follows:                                                                           



                     1Application for patent filed August 12, 1992.                                                      
                                                           1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007