THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DONALD A. GRAHAM and RANDALL P. ROBERTSON
__________
Appeal No. 95-5063
Application 08/058,6121
___________
HEARD: November 2, 1998
___________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8
through 15. The examiner subsequently allowed claims 8 and 9
1Application for patent filed May 6, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/510,377, filed April 17, 1990, now Patent No.
5,243,339, issued September 7, 1993 which is a continuation-
in-part of Application 07/203,367, filed June 7, 1988, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007