THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN F. SCARZELLO,
DANIEL S. LENKO, and ADAM C. FEAGA
____________
Appeal No. 95-5091
Application No. 08/054,1661
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and TORCZON, Administrative
Patent Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
BACKGROUND
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claim 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. At the end of
extensive, and contentious, briefing by the examiner and
Appellants, all other pending claims, claims 1-31, stand
allowed. We affirm.
1 Navy Case No. 75,175.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007