Ex parte SCARZELLO et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
               This opinion (1) was not written for publication and                    
               (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                              
                                                                Paper No. 28           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                     ____________                                      
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     ____________                                      
                             Ex parte JOHN F. SCARZELLO,                               
                          DANIEL S. LENKO, and ADAM C. FEAGA                           
                                     ____________                                      
                                  Appeal No. 95-5091                                   
                             Application No. 08/054,1661                               
                                     ____________                                      
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ____________                                      
          Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and TORCZON, Administrative                    
          Patent Judges.                                                               
          TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                                      BACKGROUND                                       
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final                  
          rejection of claim 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  At the end of                  
          extensive, and contentious, briefing by the examiner and                     
          Appellants, all other pending claims, claims 1-31, stand                     
          allowed.  We affirm.                                                         



               1    Navy Case No. 75,175.                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007