THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WILLIAM J. TAYLOR, JOSEPH F. LESSAR,
LOUIS E. HALPERIN and ROBERT E. KRASKA
________________
Appeal No. 95-5093
Application 08/047,1321
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and
3-7, all the claims remaining in the present application. Claim
1 is illustrative:
1Application for patent filed April 9, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/879,252, filed May 1, 1992, now abandoned; which
is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/419,881, filed
October 11, 1989, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007