THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MING-HONG HUNG and SHLOMO ROZEN
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0008
Application 08/243,4281
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-5,
all the claims remaining in the present application. A copy
of illustrative claim 1 is appended to this decision.
Application for patent filed May 16, 1994. According to appellants1
this application is a continuation of application 07/991,401, filed December
15, 1992, which is a continuation of application 07/530,376, filed May 30,
1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007