THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MUHAMMAD ASLAM, LAWRENCE DEMEJO and DINESH TYAGI
____________
Appeal No. 96-0116
Application No. 08/088,0121
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN SMITH, GARRIS, and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the
examiner to allow claims 1-20 as amended subsequent to the
final rejection. These are all the claims in the application.
1Application for patent filed July 6, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007