Appeal No. 96-0158 Application No. 08/110,003 contend but instead is for the purpose of removing excess solution and to rupture any solution membranes that may have formed in the pores during the soak (e.g., see line 56 in column 2 and lines 27 through 31 in column 4). In this latter regard, we emphasize that the soaking step of Marek is intended to ensure that his carbon foam precursor material is absorbed into the polyurethane strands of his porous material substrate to thereby become an integral part of such strands and not simply a coating (e.g., see lines 50 through 55 in column 2). Toward that end, patentee’s soaking step may be for a period of time up to four hours or longer (e.g., see lines 44 and 45 in column 3). By ensuring that his solution absorbs into the polyurethane strands so as to fully penetrate the structure (see lines 4 through 6 and 13 through 18 in column 3), patentee achieves a carbonized foam of superior mechanical properties (see lines 20 through 24 in column 2) relative to prior art techniques in which the carbon precursor material simply coated the foam structure (see lines 36 through 66 in column 1 and the paragraph bridging columns 1 and 2). 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007