THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROY S. RIEBER, WILLIAM A. MALLOW,
and JESSE R. CONNER
__________
Appeal No. 96-0216
Application 07/842,9151
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3
through 10, and 12 through 18. Claims 19 through 29 are also
1Application for patent filed February 27, 1992. According
to the appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/483,440, filed February 7, 1990, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/225,107, filed July 27,
1988, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007