Ex parte WANG - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        
                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                          
                          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                            
                          journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                                                                               
                          Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                Paper No. 25                            
                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                       Ex parte ROBERT C. WANG                                                                          
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 96-0273                                                                           
                                                    Application No. 08/246,3871                                                                         
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                 ____________                                                                           
                 Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and BARRETT, Administrative Patent                                                                             
                 Judges.                                                                                                                                
                 HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                 


                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                                                                        
                 through 10.  In an Amendment After Final (paper number 20),                                                                            




                          1Application for patent filed May 20, 1994.  According to                                                                     
                 the appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of                                                                            
                 Application No. 08/165,568, filed December 13, 1993, which is                                                                          
                 a continuation of Application No. 07/947,695, filed September                                                                          
                 21, 1992.                                                                                                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007