THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT C. WANG
____________
Appeal No. 96-0273
Application No. 08/246,3871
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 10. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 20),
1Application for patent filed May 20, 1994. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 08/165,568, filed December 13, 1993, which is
a continuation of Application No. 07/947,695, filed September
21, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007