Appeal No. 96-0310
Application 08/084,502
The examiner relies on the following references:
Mullin 3,641,488 Feb. 08, 1972
Holst et al. (Holst) 5,265,468 Nov. 30, 1993
(filed Feb. 27,
1992)
Claims 1-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As
evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Holst in view of
Mullin.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support
for the rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants'
arguments set forth in the brief along with the examiner's
rationale in support of the rejection and arguments in
rebuttal set forth in the examiner's answer.
It is our view, after consideration of the record
before us, that the collective evidence relied upon and the
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007