THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WOJCIECH M. CHROSNY,
and KHOSROW EGHTESADI
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0327
Application 07/961,7951
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and LEE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 10-14 and 20-25.
Claims 8 and 9 have been canceled. Claims 2-7, 15-19, and 26-
27 have been objected to as containing allowable subject
matter but depending from a rejected claim.
References relied on by the Examiner
1 Application for patent filed October 16, 1992. Assigned to Pitney Bowes
Inc.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007