Ex parte PONTUTI et al. - Page 3




             Appeal No. 96-0353                                                                                   
             Application 08/099,220                                                                               


                    (c) positioning a seam tape in said adjoining region                                          
             such that a portion of said tape simultaneously overlays and                                         
             contacts each sheet within the adjoining region and extends                                          
             substantially the length of the adjoining region, said tape                                          
             comprising a seam scrim substantially embedded in a seam                                             
             thermoplastic material having an index of refraction similar                                         
             to the scrim of the seam tape, said seam scrim capable of                                            
             being substantially wetted out by said seam thermoplastic                                            
             material;                                                                                            
                    (d) heating said adjoining region to a temperature which                                      
             exceeds the melting temperature of said seam thermoplastic                                           
             material;                                                                                            
                    (e) exerting sufficient pressure to said heated region                                        
             to substantially wet out said seam scrim; and                                                        
                    (f) allowing said adjoining region to cool.                                                   
                                               THE REFERENCES                                                     
             Griffith                     3,734,795             May  22,                                          
             1973                                                                                                 
             Stilling                     4,682,433             Jul. 28,                                          
             1987                                                                                                 
                                                THE REJECTION                                                     
                    Claims 7-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                     
             unpatentable over Griffith in view of Stilling.                                                      
                                                    OPINION                                                       
                    We have carefully considered all of the arguments                                             
             advanced by appellants and the examiner and agree with                                               
             appellants that the aforementioned rejection is not well                                             

                                                       -3-3                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007