Appeal No. 96-0354 Page 3
Application No. 08/099,066
BACKGROUND
The appellants' invention relates to a method and device
for web cutting in the former of a paper machine. An
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading
of exemplary claims 1 and 8, which appear in the appendix to
the appellants' brief.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Heys 2,857,822 Oct.
28, 1958
Miyamoto 3,556,936 Jan. 19,
1971
Peterson 3,652,390 Mar. 28,
1972
Claims 1 through 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Peterson in view of Miyamoto.
Claims 6, 7, 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Peterson in view of Miyamoto as
applied above, and further in view of Heys.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007