THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THOMAS P. LAMBERT,
and GREGORY A. LUDGATE
_____________
Appeal No. 96-0356
Application 08/163,6351
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before COHEN, McQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 3-5, 7-9 and 11. Claims 2, 6, 10 and 14
have been canceled. Claims 12, 13, 15 and 16 are allowed.
Appellants’ claimed subject matter is an apparatus for moving a
sheet. Claim 1 is exemplary of the subject matter on appeal and
recites:
1Application for patent filed December 9, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007