THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte TAKASHI NAITO and TAMOTSU MAEDA
_______________
Appeal No. 96-0496
Application 08/131,3321
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, SMITH, JERRY and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 6, 10, 17 and 18 and 5, 9, 11, 12 and 16, the latter five
having been amended by appellants in an amendment and reply
brief, filed October 5, 1995 (Paper No. 15), which amendment and
reply brief have been entered by the examiner. Also, in that
amendment, claims 1 through 4, 7, 8, 13 through 15 and 19 have
1 Application for patent filed October 4, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007