THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SHARAM HEKMATPOUR,
DAVID A. HODSON and DAVID J. MANN
__________
Appeal No. 96-0538
Application 08/126,4501
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 4, 7 through 11, 13 through
16, 18 and 20. Inasmuch as the application was filed without a claim 7, only claims 1 through 4, 8
1Application for patent filed September 24, 1993. According to the appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/773,372, filed October 7, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007