THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte EDWARD E. JAFFE and MARTIN TANNER
________________
Appeal No. 96-0700
Application No. 08/153,5501
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-3, 14
and 15. Claims 4-13, the other claims in the present
application, have been allowed by the examiner. A copy of
illustrative claim 1 is appended to this decision.
1Application for patent filed November 16, 1993.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/924, 208, filed August 3, 1992; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/737,799, filed
July 26, 1991; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/520,487, filed May 8, 1990, all abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007