Appeal No. 96-0877
Application 08/123,639
through 7 and 8/4.
In summary:
1. The rejection of claims 1, 2, 3, 8/1 and 9 based on
the description requirement in the first paragraph of § 112 is
affirmed.
2. The rejection of claims 4 through 7 and 8/4 based on
the description requirement in the first paragraph of § 112 is
reversed.
3. The rejection of claims 1 through 9 based on the
enablement requirement in the first paragraph of § 112 is
reversed.
4. The rejection of claims 2, 3 and 9 under the second
paragraph of § 112 is affirmed.
5. The rejection of claims 1, 2, 3, 8/1 and 9 under § 103
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007