Appeal No. 96-0922
Application 08/251,306
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
17 and 18. These claims constitute all of the claims remain-
ing in the application.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a watercraft. An
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading
of exemplary claims 17 and 18, copies of which appear in the
APPENDIX to the brief (Paper No. 16).
As evidence of anticipation, the examiner has ap-
plied the documents listed below:
Hegg et al. (Hegg) 4,548,155 Oct. 22, 1985
Crone 4,896,744 Jan. 30,
1990
The following rejections are before us for review.2
2A final rejection of claim 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, was overcome as indicated by the examiner on
page 1 of the answer (Paper No. 13).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007