Paper No. 31
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte DANIEL S. LENKO
AND THOMAS P. FREDERICK
______________
Appeal No. 96-0939
Application 07/853,2211
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT, and PATE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 10 through 15 as amended after final rejection. Of the
Application for patent filed March 16, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007