THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MANFRED FRANETZKI
____________
Appeal No. 96-0943
Application No. 08/142,8321
____________
HEARD: January 15, 1998
____________
Before McQUADE, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 17 through 22 and 24 through 28. Claim 23
has been objected to as depending from a non allowed claim.
Claims 1 through 16 have been canceled.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed October 25, 1993. According
to the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/913,627, filed July 16, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007