Ex parte WEITZEL et al - Page 1




                                                        Paper No. 18                    

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                             
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                    
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                      
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                         
                                    _______________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _______________                                     
                              Ex parte CHARLES E. WEITZEL                               
                                          and                                           
                                     CARL SHURBOFF                                      
                                    ______________                                      
                                  Appeal No. 96-1203                                    
                               Application 08/298,721 1                                 
                                    _______________                                     
                                    ON BRIEF                                            
                                    _______________                                     
          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges .            
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge .                                    
                                                                                       
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                    
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                        
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-12, which constitute                
          all the claims remaining in the application.  An amendment after              




               1Application for patent filed August 31, 1994.                           
                                           1                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007