Appeal No. 96-1293
Application 07/998,673
The examiner's rejection of claims 1, 4 through 6 and
14 through 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Ziegelman in view of Patena is sustained.
The rejection of claims 2, 3, 10 and 11 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Ziegelman in view of Patena
taken further in view of Paul is sustained with regard to
claims 2, 10 and 11, but reversed as to claim 3.
The rejection of claim 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Ziegelman in view of Patena as applied to
claim 1 and further in view of Herndon is sustained.
The rejection of claims 7, 9 and 12 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 based on Ziegelman in view of Patena, Paul and Morton is
sustained as to claim 7, but is reversed as to claims 9 and 12.
The rejection of claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Ziegelman in view of Patena and Misawa is
reversed.
13
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007