THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MIKIHIRO IOKA
and MASATO KUROKAWA
____________
Appeal No. 96-1328
Application No. 07/904,9121
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, KRASS, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
BACKGROUND
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-11, all of the pending claims. We
reverse.
1 Attorney docket no. JA991-523. The application was
filed 26 June 1992. Appellants claim the benefit of Japanese
patent application 3-242329, filed 29 August 1991, but have
not provided a certified priority document.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007