THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FUMIHIKO YOKOGAWA
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1346
Application 08/122,6111
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, KRASS and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 7 and 9-19, all the claims pending in the
application.
The invention pertains to a constant angular velocity optical disk. Claim 1 is illustrative and
1Application for patent filed September 15, 1993. According to applicant, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/855,775, filed March 23, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007