Ex parte YOKOGAWA - Page 1




                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                        

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                                    
               publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           


                                                                                             Paper No. 28                            

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          
                                                          _____________                                                              

                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                          _____________                                                              

                                               Ex parte FUMIHIKO YOKOGAWA                                                            
                                                          _____________                                                              

                                                       Appeal No. 96-1346                                                            
                                                     Application 08/122,6111                                                         
                                                         ______________                                                              

                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                 
                                                        _______________                                                              

               Before URYNOWICZ, KRASS and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                     

               URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               


                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              

                       This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 7 and 9-19, all the claims pending in the             

               application.                                                                                                          

                       The invention pertains to a constant angular velocity optical disk.  Claim 1 is illustrative and              


                       1Application for patent filed September 15, 1993.  According to applicant, this application is a              
               continuation of Application 07/855,775, filed March 23, 1992.                                                         
                                                                 1                                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007