Appeal No. 96-1368 Application 08/080,891 (b) the rejection of claims 2, 3, 5, and 11 based on Rogers in view of Takayanagi and Tatsuno. The following § 103 rejections have been affirmed: (i) the rejection of claim 1 based on Murty in view of De Vaan; (ii) the rejection of claims 2, 3, 5, and 11 based on Murty in view of De Vaan and Tatsuno; (iii) the rejection of claim 6 based on Iwanaga in view of Murty, Rogers, and De Vaan; and (iv) the rejection of claims 13, 14, and 16 based on Iwanaga in view of Murty, Rogers, De Vaan, and Tatsuno. - 17 -Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007