THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDWARD H. STUPP and BABAR A. KHAN
____________
Appeal No. 96-1394
Application No. 08/179,8011
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 17
through 25, 27, 28, 30 and 31.
1Application for patent filed January 11, 1994.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 08/098,662, filed July 28, 1993, now Patent
No. 5,305,128, which is a continuation of Application No.
07/921,953, filed July 29, 1992, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application No. 07/725,368, filed June 27,
1991, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Application
No. 07/456,026, filed December 22, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007