Appeal No. 96-1415 Application No. 08/088,625 while claim 43 recites that it is. As a result of this inconsistency, claim 45 is indefinite because its scope is not clear. Conclusion The examiner’s decision to reject the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. � 102(e) and/or � 103 is reversed. Claims 1 to 4, 7, 16, 17, 23 to 25, 33, 41 to 43 and 46 are rejected pursuant to 37 CFR 1.196(b). This decision contains new grounds of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR � 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)). 37 CFR � 1.196(b) provides that, “A new ground of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial review.” 37 CFR � 1.196(b) also provides that the appellants, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with respect to the new grounds of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007