Ex parte TAKAHASHI - Page 1




                                                       Paper No. 29                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                             Ex parte KATSUMI TAKAHASHI                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 96-1489                                   
                              Application 08/139,8761                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                   ON BRIEF                                           
                                   _______________                                    
          Before THOMAS, KRASS, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s                
          final rejection of claims 1-6, which constitute all the claims              

               Application for patent filed October 22, 1993.  According to1                                                                     
          appellant, this application is a continuation of Application 07/790,177,    
          filed November 12, 1991.                                                    
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007