Paper No. 24
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte SYED V. AHAMED
and VICTOR B. LAWRENCE
______________
Appeal No. 96-1492
Application 07/666,1621
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before URYNOWICZ, THOMAS and JERRY SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11,
13, 14 and 17-36. Claims 3, 6, 7, 9, 12, 15 and 16 have been
Application for patent filed March 7, 1991.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007