THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ALEXANDER LEVRAN, JOSEPH M. NOWOSIELSKI,
GIAO M. TON-THAT, RAMAMOORTHY RAJAGOPALAN,
HENRI MABBOUX, AND DAVID MAZUR
__________
Appeal No. 96-1560
Application 08/084,3661
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed June 29, 1993. According to appellants, this
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/935,041, filed August 25, 1992, now
Patent No. 5,414,600; and a continuation-in-part of Application 07/951,208, filed
September 25, 1992, now Patent No. 5,592,137.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007