Appeal No. 96-1615
Application 08/249,650
transmittance from about 400 to 770nm. on average and at least
about 90% transmittance at about a 30E angle between about 400
to 700nm." Finally, we note that each independent claim on
appeal recites this 30E angle, whereas Martin appears silent
as to any angular representation other then what the artisan
may be able to perceive as a normal 90E representation.
In view of the foregoing, we have reversed the rejection
of all claims on appeal under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C.
§ 112. Additionally, we have reversed the alternative
rejections of each independent claim on appeal under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102 and 35 U.S.C. § 103. It follows then that we cannot
sustain the
rejection of the remaining dependent claims under 35 U.S.C. §
103 in light of additional prior art. Therefore, the decision
of the examiner rejecting the claims on appeal is reversed.
REVERSED
)
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007