THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte VICTOR B. ROBINETT
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1639
Application 08/269,1401
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-13. The other remaining claims,
Claims 14 and 15, have been indicated as directed to patentable subject matter.
Claim 1 reads as follows:
1Application for patent filed June 30, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007