THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TSIU C. CHAN and FRANK R. BRYANT
____________
Appeal No. 96-1656
Application 08/182,8091
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
22-39 and 41-45. Claim 40 is the other remaining claim and has
been indicated as directed to patentable subject matter.
Application for patent filed January 14, 1994. According1
to appellants, this application is a division of Application
07/889,822 filed May 29, 1992, now Patent No. 5,310,692 issued
May 10, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007