Appeal No. 96-1809 Application 08/094,724 shape or from a plastic material such as nylon (col. 3, lines 30-32 and 53-55). In another form, the dispensing elements are constructed from a group of straight fibers resembling a small brush (150) (col. 3, lines 56-59). Harrison fails to describe: 1. “applying onto a transfer element having a liquid-impermeable surface for supporting a liquid,” a quantity of liquid sample over the supporting surface, and 2. “placing the transfer element liquid-supporting surface in contact with all of said surface area of a test element at once.” “A claim is anticipated only if each and every element as set forth in the claim is found, either expressly or inherently described, in a single prior art reference.” Verdegaal Bros., Inc. v. Union Oil Co. of California, 814 F.2d 628, 631, 2 USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1987). A. Harrison fails to describe “applying onto a transfer element having a liquid-impermeable surface for supporting a liquid,” a quantity of liquid sample over the supporting surface At the outset, we note that there appears to be a dispute as to the interpretation of claim 1. More specifically, there appears to be a dispute as to whether claim 1 only requires 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007