THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte ROBERT MACOMBER _____________ Appeal No. 96-1919 Application 08/097,4381 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before URYNOWICZ, BARRETT and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges. URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 4-8 and 15. The invention pertains to a circuit that generates an interrupt signal when events are detected and that allows a host device to process all of the detected events without delay. Claims 1 and 4 are illustrative and read as follows: 1Application for patent filed July 26, 1993. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007