THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOHN M. LACRIOLA
__________
Appeal No. 96-2099
Application 08/128,9761
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge and
MEISTER and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
John M. Lacriola (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claim 26. Claims 1-5, 7, 8, 10-12, 19-22, 24 and2
27-33, the only other claims remaining in the application, stand
1Application for patent filed September 29, 1993.
2Claim 26 has been amended subsequent to final rejection by
an amendment filed on March 9, 1995 (Paper No. 6).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007