THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOSEF THEURER and FRIEDRICH PEITL
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2142
Application 08/284,3881
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 7 to
9 and 11. The other claims remaining in the application, claims
3 to 6 and 12, have been allowed.
The subject matter in issue concerns a machine for lining a
track. The appealed claims are set forth in the appendix to
appellants' brief.
Application for patent filed August 2, 1994.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007