Appeal No. 96-2143
Application 08/046,056
Ivers et al. (Ivers) 4,887,699 Dec. 19, 1989
Froeschle et al. (Froeschle) 4,981,309 Jan. 01, 1991
The following rejection is the sole rejection before us
for review.
Claims 9, 15, and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Froeschle in view of Ivers.
The full text of the examiner's rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellants appears in the
supplemental examiner’s answer of July 29 1996., while the
complete statement of appellants’ argument can be found in the
main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 13 and 16).3
OPINION
In reaching our conclusion on the issues raised in this
appeal, this panel of the board has carefully considered
An appeal brief supplement (Paper No. 19) was submitted in response to3
an order for compliance (Paper No. 18).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007