THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANCIS J. CALLAGHAN and WILLIAM VOLLMAN1
____________
Appeal No. 96-2179
Application 07/613,4662
____________
HEARD: 5 May 19983
____________
Before HAIRSTON, TORCZON, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative
Patent Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
1 According to Appellants, Robert A. Malkin is also a
co-inventor. (Paper "A" (Req. FWC App., 7 Nov. 1990) at 1.)
Since the record does not otherwise reflect this fact,
Appellants should comply with 37 CFR § 1.48, as amended at
62 Fed. Reg. 53131, 53185 (Oct. 10, 1997).
2 Attorney docket no. CASE-78.
3 Counsel for Appellants requested a hearing via
teleconference. Although the examiner asked to present oral
argument pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.194(b), he subsequently waived
his request.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007