THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GREG P. FITZPATRICK, ABDOLREZA SALASHOUR,
and MARVIN L. WILLIAMS
____________
Appeal No. 96-2242
Application No. 08/083,2421
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 18. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 6),
claim 1 was amended.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus
for presenting an object in a data processing system.
1Application for patent filed June 25, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007