THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte M. STEPHEN LAJOIE, AMY L. JOSEPH,
KEITH A. JONES and ANTHONY E. WINSTON
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2311
Application 08/139,0571
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS, DOWNEY and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision
rejecting claims 42 and 46 through 61, which are all of the
claims remaining in the application.
Application for patent filed October 21, 1993. According to1
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application 07/881,694,
filed May 12, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007