THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 49
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte YOSHIKAZU SHIMIZU and SATOMI NAKAGAWA
__________
Appeal No. 96-2547
Application 08/101,6731
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Application for patent filed August 4, 1993.1
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/729,647, filed July 15, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007