THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YESHAYAHU S. A. GOLDSTEIN
and MELVIN WIDNER
____________
Appeal No. 96-2652
Application No. 08/329,7551
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 28, 31, 35, 38 and 40-42. Claims 1-27 and
36-37 are allowed. Claims 29-30, 32-34 and 39 are objected to
as being dependant upon a rejected base claim but would be
allowable of rewritten in independent form.
1Application for patent filed October 26, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007