THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte OLE K. NILSSEN
_______________
Appeal No. 96-2673
Application 07/851,8871
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 Application for patent filed March 16, 1992. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/819,655, filed January 13, 1992; which is a continuation of
Application 07/643,023, filed January 18, 1991; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 06/787,692, filed October 15,
1985; which is a continuation of Application 06/644,155, filed
August 27, 1984; which is a continuation of Application
06/555,426, filed November 23, 1983; which is a continuation of
Application 06/178,107, filed August 14, 1980, said 06/555,426,
filed November 23, 1983; which is a continuation-in-part of
Application 06/330,159, filed December 14, 1981, now Patent No.
4,430,628; which is a division of Application 05/973,741, filed
December 28, 1978, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part
of Application 05/890,586, filed March 20, 1978, now Patent No.
4,184,128.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007